by Bobb Sleezer, RBP, FBCA
The Journal of Biocommunication
- a simple title for a document that represents the writings of
a diverse group of eclectic, creative individuals and professions.
For those of us earning a living in the various communications specialties
which give life to this publication, “The Journal”,
as many of us affectionately call it, is a critical point of reference
from which to learn about one another and how we communicate using
the tools at our disposal. Our publication has changed before us
and because of us, from a quarterly hard copy to an electronic version,
with updates as they become available. It has been transformed by
virtue of changing technologies into an effective communications
tool in our early 21st century, creating a network for understanding
and sharing of our various skills, levels of knowledge, and the
tools and applications we rely upon to create the finished products
we are asked to produce. Now, more than ever before, our Journal
is a living mechanism for information sharing, one that each of
us should utilize, and to a degree, depend on to effectively communicate
within the profession of biocommunication.
So how do we, as visual presentation specialists in an electronic
world, know what one another is trying to communicate with the digital
images we generate? Illustrators are at home with CMYK and offset
presses; photographers create with RGB in several flavors of sRGB
- Adobe sRGB(1998), Bruce RGB or ProPhoto RGB just to name a few
- along with a multitude of paper, inkjet and thermal dye transfer
options to create display prints and digital presentations. Video
production specialists rely on green sync for color reference, and
those of us in management are happy with whatever gets a high quality
product out the door on time that satisfies the client. We all use
different digital processes, vendors, operating systems, image capture
and image output devices. Concepts, ideas and techniques are expressed
in one digital language, but often seen or heard with another. With
all we do, is there a standard of digital imaging communication
that we can use as a common language?
Actually there is, and that is the focus of this issue’s
TechBytes. Recently a symposium of eleven international photo trade
organizations compiled a set of fifteen guidelines for digital imaging,
along with several Best Practices documents. It was brought to our
attention by Jim Koepfler through the BCATalk listserve. Fortunately,
Jim saw it for what it was worth, and sent it on for the rest of
us to benefit from. Let’s take a closer look. It all started
with the following press release a little over a year ago:
Media Contacts:
Richard Anderson
(410) 532-7470
richard@rnaphoto.com
David Riecks
(877) 646-5375
david@riecks.com
DIGITAL IMAGING GUIDELINES AIM
TO SMOOTH IMAGE REPRODUCTION ISSUES
NEW YORK (Oct. 21, 2005) — The Universal Photographic
Digital Imaging Guidelines officially become a public document today
during PhotoPlus Expo at the Javits Center. And public they are,
available for all to see – and download – and use without
charge at www.updig.org.
The 15 Guidelines – along with accompanying
Best Practices documents – aim to clarify issues affecting
accurate reproduction and management of digital image files. Although
they were created from a photographer’s perspective, the group
has worked hard to incorporate the concerns of everyone involved
in the process of reproducing digital images. Anyone working with
digital images should find them useful.
The guidelines have three primary goals:
- Digital images look the same as they transfer between devices,
platforms and vendors.
- Digital images are prepared in the correct resolution, at the
correct size, for the device(s) on which they will be viewed or
printed.
- Digital images have metadata embedded that conforms to the
IPTC standards, making the images searchable, providing usage
and contact information, and stating their creators or copyright
owners.
Much Accomplished in a Year
The effort to help bring order to the exchange of digital image
files got off the ground just one year ago at PhotoPlus, when leaders
and representatives of nearly a dozen photographers groups from
around the world gathered for a “Digital Summit.” They
agreed the Guidelines and Best Practices were needed and should
be easy to understand, offering options for different workflows,
aimed at different outputs – from HiFi color printing presses
to online media.
Several folks stepped forward to help craft the Guidelines, and
before long the group had established an online forum for communications.
By early in 2005, the group agreed on the name Universal Photographic
Digital Imaging Guidelines, and draft ideas were circulating. David
Riecks, who was serving as the Digital Committee chair for ASMP
and an authority on image archiving, created and hosts a website
for UPDIG.
By spring, Richard Anderson, now a national board member for the
American Society of Media Photographers, had stepped in to organize
and write The Guidelines. Greg Smith, Business Practices Committee
chairman for the National Press Photographers Association, helped
Anderson edit the documents, and others contributed critiques and
ideas. ASMP’s Peter Dyson crafted a draft web version of the
guidelines, which later grew into the current web presentation and
downloadable PDF.
A year after its birth, the group has invited several photographic
vendors to join the discussions, as well as representatives from
photographic agencies, graphic design groups and more. While determined,
for the time being, to remain an informal group, UPDIG is interested
in feedback from all concerned about issues of digital imaging file
exchange. Please send ideas and inquiries to info@updig.org
Member Groups
Organizations currently represented on the steering committee
for UPDIG include:
ACMP (Australian Commercial and Media Photographers)
AIPA (Advertising and Illustrative Photographers Association)
AOP (The Association Of Photographers)
APA (The Advertising Photographers of America)
ASMP (The American Society of Media Photographers)
ASPP (American Society of Picture Professionals)
CAPIC (The Canadian Association of Photographers and Illustrators
in Communication)
EP (Editorial Photographers)
PPA (Professional Photographers of America)
NPPA (National Press Photographers Association)
SAA (Stock Artists Alliance)
###
At the time of the release, David Riecks, who is the
Chairman of the ASMP Digital Photography Standards and Practices
Committed stated the following: “Anyone in the process of
switching from analog to digital photography, or looking for guidance
in shooting digitally should check out the new Universal Photographic
Digital Imaging Guidelines that are available from http://www.updig.org.
These guidelines are the collaborative result of a coalition of
eleven of the world’s premier photo trade organizations, and
can be viewed online or downloaded as a printable PDF.”
Quite a news release, and certainly information worth
further investigation. Sounds simple enough in principle, but when
has anything to do with any imaging technology been simple in reality?
The goals were clearly stated, but what would grow out of it? We
have all taken on projects that seemed to take on a life of their
own, demanding far more time and effort than estimated. In review
of the guidelines the working group agreed to three primary goals
for digital imaging:
- That digital images look the same as they transfer between devices,
platforms, and vendors.
- That digital images are prepared in the correct resolution,
at the correct size, for the device(s) on which they will be viewed
or printed.
- That digital images have metadata embedded that conforms to
the IPTC standards, making the images searchable, providing usage
and contact information, and stating their creators or copyright
owners (Anderson, 2005)
Only one way to find out how successful the UPDIG committee was
– head over to the website at www.updig.com
and see what was accomplished both on-line and in the printed document.
Once there, it did not take long to realize that the information
available was easily communicated in a standard language to any
digital imaging profession. The site is filled with clear, concise
statements that have further embedded links to aid in clarification.
There are links, footnotes, source notes, and definitions for every
guideline. If you ever had a question about digital imaging, you
can find the answer here. The UPDIG group has successfully created
a standard of communication for a multitude of visual presentation
groups, and a standard that all of us could benefit from understanding
and adhering to. From a concept adopted by the UPDIG Committee,
it was the mission of the group not to invent something new, but
rather to pull together the best of current technology. Clearly
the committee adhered to that effort in a wonderful way. The set
of guidelines provides us with a common ground to converse with
one another, and accurately see exactly what each other is creating.
Often, our most effective communication occurs when we look outside
ourselves and see what others are doing.
While the available PDF is worth printing for quick reference itself,
there is substantially more information located in the online version.
Active links are present for many of the topics, providing further
clarification and insight. This feature alone sets a foundation
of definition and understanding for all imaging professionals.
As an example, if we look at color management (a topic which everyone
has an opinion about) we can reach beyond the essential definition
and expand into content and other resources which brings further
clarity. On the UPDIG Guidelines Page, http://www.updig.org/guidelines/index.html,
the first item is Manage the Color. Within that item line is an
active link, ICC, that takes us to the website for the International
Colour Consortium (www.color.org),
with plenty of technical information to sift through. If you visit
the ICC main page click on the link in the left column to ICC Specifications,
then select the current specification. A PDF of 112 pages of color
standards information is available for your use. Go back to the
ICC main page, select the Colour Management Links option, and you
have another extensive list of resources. Within that list, choose
the link to http://www.freecolormanagement.com/color/links.html,
and you will find a proverbial “pot of gold” at the
end of the full color spectrum of color management! At this point
on the UPDIG site we have gone through three layers of information,
yet there is still more to access if desired.
Let’s look at an area that many of us have fought with over
the years of digital imaging. Take the phrase, “To avoid problems
with files that will be transferred across computing platforms…”
Sound familiar? Well, in item seven of the Guidelines, UPDIG delves
into this area with some basic information and another link, to
an extensive resource titled as the Controlled
Vocabulary Website. It takes us directly to a page titled, “Recommendations
for Limitations on Image Filenaming” which now displays extensive
in-depth information regarding filenaming, and another link within
that information which takes us over to another reference source,
“Filenames as a Strategy to Managing Your Image Assets”
for more insight. This is an open door to other demanding areas
of digital imaging, areas that require just as much attention to
detail in building effective digital imaging workflow paths as well
as fostering effective communication between digital imaging professionals.
You could spend an hour or two just reviewing your procedures or
learning how to improve them.
The amount of cross-referenced information that can be accessed
by starting in the UPDIG Guidelines is astounding. The functionality
has been constructed to generate multiple layers of information
depth and branching, and clearly testifies to the extensive effort
by the committee members to gather every resource available to establish
these standards, guidelines and applications.
During a phone conversation with David Riecks, he stated that the
concept behind the design of the guidelines was provided by George
Fulton who suggested using the First Aid Triage method where a patient
is progressively evaluated to establish a category of treatment.
The guidelines follow a similar methodology in accessing additional
levels of information about a particular topic (the patient) that
further define the condition. It works beautifully.
When asked about the future of digital imaging and the role of
UPDIG, Mr. Riecks commented. “It is not the intent of the
committee to invent new standards or implement some new color workspaces.
Rather, it is our intent to collect the best of the current technology
and workflow methods for everyone to have access to. We are establishing
individual working groups who will be evaluating specific areas
such as monitors, archival workflow, and other topics of interest
.”
Many of us have implemented standards of production for our workplaces,
and some of our members have authored articles about the benefits
of standardization in this or sister journals, long before digital
imaging existed. The accomplishment of the UPDIG committee in establishing
and defining this list of digital imaging standards is exceptional.
The Universal Photographic Digital Imaging Guidelines list,
along with the associated Best Practices: Tools and Methods
for Applying Guidelines and the Best Practices: Applying
the Guidelines to your Workflow should prove to be one of the
most effective communications our organizations have shared.
Reference:
Anderson, Richard, 2005. The Universal Photographic Digital Imaging
Guidelines; www.updig.org.
About the author
Bobb Sleezer, RBP, FBCA
Bsleezer@juno.com
RSleezer@ChristianaCare.org
Bobb Sleezer is the Manager of Visual Presentation Technology within
the Department of Academic Affairs at the Christiana Care Health
System in Newark, Delaware. He has been employed at several major
universities and also in the private sector, working with digital
imaging technologies.
|